Mobilk - A surprising 44% of executives characterize leadership
development in their organization as poor, and more than half describe it as ineffective,
according to the 2016 Leadership Development Survey conducted by Borderless
Research℠.
The survey captured insights from close to 1,000 senior executives across a range of
industries. The high rate of response and depth of feedback demonstrate that leadership
development is of high relevance and is considered a key enabler of business strategy
and growth.
Key findings
• Leadership Development is believed to be a main driver for ensuring delivery of
business results (43%) and business growth (20%).
• Nearly half of respondents (44%) characterize leadership development in their
organization as poor, and more than half (54%) describe it as ineffective.
• A large majority (nearly 60%) are dissatisfied with their organization’s investment in
leadership development activities, and more than 65% state that the level of their
organization’s investment in these activities has, in recent years, declined or
stagnated.
• 29% of respondents are not aware of their organization having any kind of
leadership coaching or mentoring program.
• A majority (56%) believe support from top management to be a critical success
factor for ensuring effective leadership development within organizations.
The Borderless perspective
The level of satisfaction with the effectiveness of and investment in leadership
development is low, suggesting that either too little effort is made by organizations to
establish leadership development programs or that what has been established fails to
meet the expectations of their executives.
“In prioritizing all of the elements that go into building a successful business, it would seem
that many corporate heads consider leadership development to be a low priority ‘nice
to have’ instead of a strategic imperative,” says Niels-Peter van Doorn, Head of
Leadership Consulting at Borderless.
While most argue that effective leadership is necessary to achieve positive business
results, the lack of focus on development suggests that leaders are expected to possess
all essential leadership skills innately. This is reflected in corporate tendencies to “hire in”
senior executives instead of growing and advancing executives from within. “Overreliance
on external hiring can frustrate and demotivate teams, and could consequently
exacerbate internal organizational challenges,” Niels-Peter cautions.
To that end, Borderless offers the following six recommendations to establish robust
leadership development programs:
1. In building leadership programs, a balanced approach focusing on both
business acumen and soft skills and understanding the interrelationships
between these two elements, is required.
2. The active involvement of top executives in leadership development is
necessary, and accountability for it should be held by the CEO.
3. Organizations must accelerate the development of less experienced
executives to fill the emerging leadership gap, accentuated by ageing
executive populations in many ‘traditional’ industries.
4. Effective leadership development programs need to be grounded in real-life
challenges.
5. Job rotation, which has the added advantage of creating higher levels of
understanding and cooperation between functions, deserves higher priority if
organizations are to develop executives with broad-based general
management skills.
6. If leadership development drives profitability and growth, then active
engagement in leadership development should never be optional.
China Telecom Global Limited (CTG), the world-leading provider of integrated telecommunication services, has signed a strategic subsea capacity and..
Espoo, Finland – Nokia, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., and T-Mobile today announced that they have achieved a worlds first showcase of successfully..